Top

logo_header

Decoded Neurofeedback Project
within Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences (SRPBS),
BMI Technology Application of DecNef for development of diagnostic and care system for mental disorders and construction of clinical application bases

Consortium

In 2013, around 60 neuroscientists, neuropsychiatrists, engineers, computational scientists, and psychologists from eight Japanese universities and institutes formed a consortium as part of the Japanese Strategic Research Program for the Promotion of Brain Science (SRPBS) for big data applications, machine-learning algorithms, and sophisticated fMRI neurofeedback methods1,2 for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple psychiatric disorders. Many of these techniques are related to brain machine interfaces. SRPBS,3  a nation-wide research program for brain science is supported by the Japanese Advanced Research and Development Programs for Medical Innovation (AMED). Here, we explain the consortium’s organization, its data collection and sharing projects, its sophisticated neurofeedback projects, the construction of biomarkers for multiple psychiatric disorders, therapy based on sophisticated neurofeedback methods, and the biological dimensions for the spectrum of multiple disorders.

Organization chart

The consortium consists of eight Japanese universities and institutes (Figs. 1 and 2), and approximately 60 researchers participate (see list of participants).

Group Leader: Mitsuo Kawato (ATR Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group), members
Sub-Group Leaders:

Noriaki Yahata, Tsuyoshi Araki (Tokyo University), members
Masamichi Sakagami  (Tamagawa University), members
Hidehiko Takahashi (Kyoto University), members
Youichi Saitoh (Osaka University), members
Yasumasa Okamoto (Hiroshima University), members
Nobumasa Kato (Showa University), members

From 2013〜 (MEXT and AMED)
Figure1_0123
Figure 1

Figure2_0123
Figure 2

Data collection

The data of the patients and the control participants were collected at the sites shown in Table 1. A coherent protocol was designed and used for the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). 4   The following table shows the number of samples collected. We used 14 scanners from various manufacturers.

26348555_draw_lzwTable
Table 1

DecNef and FCNef

The brain is not merely an input-output information transformation system; it’s also a dynamical system that generates spontaneous spatiotemporal patterns even without sensory inputs, executed movements, or cognitive tasks. These spontaneously generated patterns by brain dynamics are called spontaneous brain activities in experimental animals and resting-state brain activities in humans. The resting-state brain activity of an individual contains much information about age, cognitive capability, mental disorders, etc. By combining the information decoded from brain activity and its neurofeedback in reinforcement learning paradigms, we can unconsciously control brain activity patterns that correspond to specific information. This leads to therapies for psychiatric disorders, unconscious manipulation of facial preferences, color qualia, confidence in decision making, and an increase of cognitive capability. Decoded neurofeedback (DecNef)1 has been applied to obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and central chronic pain (Fig. 3). Functional connectivity neurofeedback (FCNef)2 has been applied to the autism spectrum disorder (ASD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and schizophrenia (SCZ) (Fig. 4), (Table 2).

Table2-2Figure 3

Figure4-2Figure 4

Table2_0123
Table 2

Biomarkers of ASD, SCZ, MDD and OCD based on rs-fcMRI

Recently, using functional-connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) techniques, attempts have developed classifiers for various psychiatric disorders and typically developed or healthy individuals to identify the abnormality of functional connections (FCs). Because no classifiers have ever been validated for an independent cohort due to the over-fitting and interferential effects of varying measurement conditions and demographic distributions, their clinical utility and neuroscientific validity continue to be questioned. Within this consortium, we overcame the above difficulties by developing a novel machine-learning algorithm that identifies a small number of abnormal FCs.5  The resultant classifier achieved high accuracy for a Japanese discovery cohort and also demonstrated good generalizations for independent validation cohorts collected in the USA and/or Netherlands. The combination of L1-SCCA and SLR has already been applied to the classification of ASD, SCZ, MDD, and OCD patients from typically developed or healthy controls. Table 3 shows the results of these studies as of December 2015. The classifiers performances continue to improve.

Table_cohort_draft_V3Table 3

 

 DecNef and FCNef therapy

Neurofeedback training based on real-time fMRIs has attracted considerable attention for its potential advantages in therapeutic treatment. Most fMRI neurofeedback methods focus on the up- or down-regulation of single region-of-interest activation, but they have recently been extended by DecNef to control spatial activity patterns within a specific ROI. DecNef can be used as a noninvasive BMI system for treating abnormal central decision-making functions in psychiatric disorders. Fukuda, Kawato, and Imamizu also demonstrated that fMRI neurofeedback can further modulate spatiotemporal activation patterns across multiple ROIs as well as intrinsic networks. This effect was preserved over a surprisingly long period. Disturbances in intrinsic networks have been reported for a number of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Consequently, the connectivity neurofeedback method could be applied not only as a causal tool for basic neuroscience to alter functional networks but also as a revolutionary therapeutic method by directly curing the pathological connectivity patterns of neurological and psychiatric diseases. DecNef or FCNef may provide revolutionary cures for psychiatric diseases.

The utility of our developed rs-fcMRI classifier is found in its neurofeedback therapy, especially FCNef.6,7 Megumi et al. (2015)2 found that four days of fMRI real-time neurofeedback of functional connectivity between two designated areas persistently changed the rs-fcMRI connectivity for more than two months. Within the above SRPBS consortium, we previously applied this connectivity fMRI neurofeedback method to ASD individuals with some preliminarily encouraging results.  The target FCs were selected by the ASD classifier in the  following ways.2,5-7  The WLS of the ASD biomarker was estimated in a real-time fMRI neurofeedback paradigm for an ASD patients, and a sign-inverted WLS value was fed back to the ASD patient as a monetary reward in a reinforcement learning framework. We expect increases in neurofeedback scores, in other words, reductions in the WLS values, to lead to attaining normal network dynamics in rs-fcMRIs.

Decoded neurofeedback (DecNef)1 has been applied to obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and central chronic pain, and preliminarily promising results were obtained.8 DecNef was especially applied to 15 patients with pain and induced statistically significant decreases in VAS compared with an adequate sham feedback control. Functional connectivity neurofeedback (FCNef)2 was applied to autism spectrum disorder (ASD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and schizophrenia (SCZ) with preliminarily promising results as well as over 15 ASD patients. Improvements of several clinical indices were observed. For a few cases, even two weeks after FCNef intervention, the resting-state intrinsic network remained in a normal pattern. 6

Spectrum of Psychiatric Disorders revealed by Artificial Intelligence and Big Data

The current diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders with childhood and adult onsets are categorical, as described by DSM-5. However, a large GWAS study identified the genetic risk loci shared by several disorders, and a meta-analysis found decreases common to several disorders in the gray matter volumes of specific brain regions; therefore, more emphasis has recently been placed on the spectrum of disorders and the exploration of biological dimensions to characterize it. This line of research might provide a neuroscience background and explain why a single drug is efficient for multiple disorders. We formed a consortium (SRPBS-DecNef) in 2013 to develop diagnosis and therapy based on computational neuroscience and machine-learning algorithms. By utilizing resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI), we developed biomarkers of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), schizophrenia, major depressive disorder (MDD), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). About 1,000 samples were collected from more than ten scanners. Our aim is to develop new therapies using decoded fMRI real-time neurofeedback (DecNef), based on multi-voxel pattern analysis,1 or connectivity real-time neurofeedback (FCNef) based on rs-fcMRI biomarkers. Here, we introduce a few studies that support a spectrum of psychiatric disorders.

Yahata et al. (2014)5 successfully developed an ASD classifier with 85% accuracy for three Japanese sites and a marked generalization capability with 75% accuracy for the USA ABIDE dataset.5  A machine-learning algorithm, which consisted of a nested feature selection by L1-SCCA and cross validation by sparse logistic regression, only selected 16 functional connections (FCs) from 9,730 FCs among 140 brain regions. The same algorithm was also applied to schizophrenia, MDD, and OCD with comparable performances. The four classifiers selected about 60 FCs, and  1,000 samples were hierarchically grouped within these 60-FC coordinates into five clusters. The hierarchical structure turned out to be ((((ASD, healthy), SCZ), OCD), MDD), and each cluster corresponded to diagnostic labels with 51–85% accuracy; the overall distribution of the samples formed a spectrum with significant overlaps among disorders.

Yamashita et al. (2015)9 predicted the learning plateau of a verbal 3-back working memory task in 17 healthy young Japanese participants by a linear weighted summation of 16 FCs among 18 functional brain networks. Their model explained the individual working memory capabilities of a much larger and more greatly diversified American dataset. It also predicted the individual differences in the working memory ability in schizophrenic patients of the SRPBS-DecNef consortium. The severity of the working memory deficit is in the order of schizophrenia, MDD, OCD, and ASD. The model reproduced not only this order but also the quantitative aspects of the deficits in different psychiatric disorders. If the neural mechanisms connecting functional brain networks with cognitive (dys)functions in different psychiatric disorders were different, no model, which was developed using only healthy participants, could have been generalized to multiple disorders. Therefore, the spectrum view of psychiatric disorders is supported at the level that connects macro-functional connectomes with cognitive functions. A common neural mechanism seems to connect functional networks with syndromes, and only FCs might be characteristically different among various psychiatric disorders.

  1. Shibata K, Watanabe T, Sasaki Y, and Kawato M: Perceptual learning incepted by decoded fMRI neurofeedback without stimulus presentation, Science, 334, 1413-1415 (2011)
  2. Megumi F, Yamashita A, Kawato M, and Imamizu H: Functional MRI neurofeedback training on connectivity between two regions induces long-lasting changes in intrinsic functional network. Front Hum Neurosci 9, 160 (2015).
  3. Home page for SRPBS http://www.nips.ac.jp/srpbs/index.html
  4. ATR protocol page http://www.cns.atr.jp/rs-fmri-protocol-2/
  5. Yahata N, Morimoto J, Hashimoto R, Shibata K, Imamizu H, Fukuda M, Kawakubo Y, Kuwabara H, Kuroda M, Yamada T, Kato N, Sasaki Y, Watanabe T, Kasai T, and Kawato M: A machine-learning-based investigation on the neural substrates of autism spectrum disorder using resting-state fMRI. The 37th Meeting of Japan Neuroscience Society, Proceedings CD-ROM P2-357 (2014)
  6. Hashimoto R: Prospects of Clinical Application of Connectivity-Based Neurofeedback to Psychiatric Disorder. The 36th Meeting of Japan Neuroscience Society, Kyoto, Japan. June 20–23, (2013).
  7. Kawato M: Computational neuroscience approach to biomarkers and treatments for psychiatric diseases (Plenary Lecture). The 11th World Congress of Biological Psychiatry, Kyoto, Japan. June 23–27, (2013).
  8. Yanagisawa, R.Fukuma, T.Shimizu, K.Hosomi, Y.Kamitani, H.Yokoi, M.Hirata, T.Yoshimine, and Y.Saitoh: Neuromodulation of deafferentation pain using real-time MEG. New Directions in Pain Neuroscience, Osaka, Japan, December 2-5, (2014)
  9. 柳澤琢史、福間良平、清水豪士、細見晃一、貴島晴彦、押野悟、平田雅之、神谷之康、吉峰俊樹、齋藤洋一:Decoded Neurofeedback による幻視痛に対する 新たなニューロモジュレーション. 機能的脳神経外科. 54, pp.12-16 (2015)
  10. 柳澤琢史:ブレインマシンインターフェース〜EcoG BMIの人への応用. Clinical Neuroscience. 34. in press
  11. Yamashita M, Kawato M, and Imamizu H: Predicting learning plateau of working memory from whole-brain intrinsic network connectivity patterns, Scientific Reports, 5, doi: 10.1038/srep07622 (2015)
  12. Yahata N, Morimoto J, Hashimoto R, Lisi G, Shibata K, Kawakubo Y, Kuwabara H, Kuroda M, Yamada T, Megumi F, Imamizu F, Náñez Sr JE,  Takahashi H, Okamoto Y, Kasai K, Kato K, Sasaki Y, Watanabe T, and Kawato M: A Small Number of Abnormal Brain Connections Predicts Adult Autism Spectrum Disorder. Nature communications. 7:11254. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11254 (2016).  —-> Press Release
    ★Nature Group全体で同時期(6週間前後)公開された論文を対象とした各種ソーシャルメディア等から集めた注目度トップ1%にランク

    ★Nature Communications日本語版おすすめコンテツで紹介(注目度の高い論文を対象)

This research was supported by the SRPBS from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED.

google805b866aee52dbd4